Elektron Octatrack MKI —  VS  — Polyend Tracker

Polyend Tracker vs. Elektron Octatrack MKI: Which Sampler Suits Your Style?

If you’re diving into the world of music production, you’ve probably heard about the Polyend Tracker and the Elektron Octatrack MKI. These two samplers are popular among music enthusiasts, but they offer very different experiences. In this post, we’ll explore their features, pros and cons, and help you decide which one might be best for your creative needs.

Introduction

In the realm of music production, having the right tools can make all the difference. Two notable sampling devices that have captured the attention of many are the Polyend Tracker and the Elektron Octatrack MKI. Both are powerhouses in their own right, yet they cater to different styles and workflows. Whether you’re looking for a fresh, modern approach or a tried-and-true classic, understanding what each sampler offers will guide you in making the best choice.

Feature Comparisons

Design and Usability

The Polyend Tracker, released in 2020, presents a modern twist on the traditional tracker-style sampler. It stands out with its sleek design and user-friendly interface. Unlike many samplers that use pads, the Tracker opts for a series of buttons for input. This might seem unusual at first, but it aligns with its unique sequencing approach. The LCD display on the Tracker is bright and clear, making it easy to navigate through its various features.

On the other hand, the Elektron Octatrack MKI, which was introduced back in 2010, offers a more classic desktop design. This sampler uses buttons and encoders for control, providing a tactile experience that many seasoned producers appreciate. Its OLED display offers crisp visuals, which is especially useful during live performances or intricate editing sessions.

Sound Quality and Effects

When it comes to sound, both samplers are impressive, but they cater to slightly different needs. The Polyend Tracker boasts a 44.1kHz sample rate and supports up to 64-note polyphony. This makes it ideal for complex musical arrangements where layering sounds is key.

Meanwhile, the Elektron Octatrack MKI offers a slightly higher 48kHz sample rate but only supports 8-note polyphony. Despite the lower polyphony, the Octatrack is renowned for its powerful effects. It includes filters, delay, and reverb, allowing users to shape their sounds with precision.

Storage and Connectivity

Storage solutions differ between the two devices. The Polyend Tracker uses a MicroSD card, a common and convenient choice for many modern devices. This makes it easy to expand your storage as needed.

Conversely, the Elektron Octatrack MKI relies on Compact Flash cards. While these might be less common today, they were the standard at the time of its release, and some users appreciate their durability.

When it comes to connectivity, the Polyend Tracker offers MIDI In/Out, USB, and audio in/out options, making it versatile for various setups. The Elektron Octatrack MKI goes a step further with MIDI In/Out/Thru, providing more options for complex MIDI configurations.

Sequencing and Software

Both samplers include robust sequencers, but their approaches differ. The Polyend Tracker’s sequencing is part of its unique charm, offering a fresh take that might appeal to those looking for something new. However, it lacks direct software integration, which might be a downside for those who rely heavily on digital audio workstations (DAWs).

The Elektron Octatrack MKI, while older, offers integration through Elektron Transfer. This can be a significant advantage for users who want to streamline their workflow between hardware and software.

Pros and Cons

Polyend Tracker

Pros:

• Modern design with a unique sequencing approach.
• High polyphony (64 notes) for complex arrangements.
• Convenient MicroSD storage.
• Clear LCD display.

Cons:

• No built-in pads, which might be a downside for some.
• Lacks direct software integration.
• Higher price point at $1200.

Elektron Octatrack MKI

Pros:

• Classic design with tactile controls.
• High-quality effects (filters, delay, reverb).
• Versatile MIDI connectivity.
• Integration with Elektron Transfer software.

Cons:

• Lower polyphony (8 notes).
• Uses Compact Flash, which is less common today.
• The older model might lack some modern features.

Summary

Choosing a sampler is a personal decision that depends on your workflow, needs, and preferences. The Polyend Tracker offers a modern take with high polyphony and unique sequencing, making it ideal for those looking for something fresh. Meanwhile, the Elektron Octatrack MKI is a classic choice, known for its robust effects and tactile controls, perfect for those who prefer a traditional approach.

Final Verdict

Who Should Choose the Polyend Tracker?

The Polyend Tracker is best for producers who enjoy exploring new methods of music creation. Its high polyphony and unique sequencing approach make it a great choice for those who like to experiment with their sound. If you’re looking for a modern sampler with a fresh perspective, the Tracker could be the perfect fit.

Who Should Choose the Elektron Octatrack MKI?

The Elektron Octatrack MKI is ideal for producers who value tried-and-true methods and a hands-on approach. Its powerful effects and MIDI versatility make it a solid choice for live performers and those who want a reliable, classic sampler. If you appreciate a tactile experience and robust integration with other Elektron devices, the Octatrack is worth considering.

In the end, both the Polyend Tracker and Elektron Octatrack MKI have their unique strengths. It all comes down to what fits your style and enhances your creative process. Happy sampling!