EMU SP-1200 vs. Native Instruments Maschine Mikro Mk3: A Battle of Samplers

Summary: In this blog, we delve into the differences between two popular samplers: the EMU SP-1200 reissued in 2021 and the Native Instruments Maschine Mikro Mk3. While both are designed to help you make music, they each have unique features and capabilities. Let’s explore which one might be the perfect fit for you!

Introduction

Music producers and beatmakers know that the right tools can make a world of difference in creating the perfect track. Samplers are essential devices that allow you to record, edit, and playback sounds, giving you a palette of sonic possibilities. Today, we’re comparing two distinct samplers: the classic EMU SP-1200 (reissued in 2021) and the modern Native Instruments Maschine Mikro Mk3. Though both are samplers, they cater to different types of music creators. Let’s dive deeper into what each offers!

The Classics vs. the Modern

EMU SP-1200: A Nod to the Past

The EMU SP-1200 is a legendary machine, loved by many hip-hop and electronic music producers for its unique 12-bit sound. The 2021 reissue by Rossum Electro-Music stays true to its roots while adding some modern touches. With a sample rate of 26.04 kHz and a polyphony of 12, the SP-1200 is known for its gritty, lo-fi sound, which has become an iconic part of many classic tracks. This reissue features an SD card slot and doubled sampling time (20 seconds total), making it more versatile than the original. Despite these updates, the SP-1200 maintains its classic hardware feel, with no screen or software integration, making it a tangible, hands-on experience.

Native Instruments Maschine Mikro Mk3: The Future of Beatmaking

In contrast, the Native Instruments Maschine Mikro Mk3 represents modern music production. Released in 2017, this sampler is a compact yet powerful tool that integrates seamlessly with your computer and music software. With 16 velocity-sensitive pads, a full-color display, and a sample rate of 44.1 kHz, the Maschine Mikro Mk3 is all about precision and versatility. It’s equipped with EQ, reverb, and delay effects, and offers a whopping 128 polyphony—far surpassing the SP-1200. Plus, it comes with its own Maschine software, giving you an extensive library of sounds to start creating right away.

Features Breakdown

Polyphony and Sound Quality

The SP-1200’s 12-voice polyphony and 12-bit sampling give it that raw, lo-fi sound that many producers crave. It’s perfect for those who love the vintage feel of older recordings and want to add that character to their tracks. On the other hand, the Maschine Mikro Mk3 offers 128-voice polyphony and a 44.1kHz sample rate, providing higher fidelity and a cleaner sound. This makes it more suitable for those who prefer a polished, modern production quality.

Pads and Controls

One of the standout features of the Maschine Mikro Mk3 is its 16 large, velocity-sensitive pads. These pads provide a responsive and tactile way to create beats and melodies. In contrast, the SP-1200 doesn’t have pads, which might be a downside for those who prefer a pad-based workflow. Instead, it focuses on a more traditional sequencing approach.

Effects and Sequencing

The SP-1200 is known for its lo-fi effects, adding a unique texture to your music. It has a built-in sequencer that is straightforward but effective for creating classic beats. The Maschine Mikro Mk3, however, offers a broader range of effects, including EQ, reverb, and delay, giving you more tools to shape your sound. Its sequencer is integrated with the Maschine software, providing a more flexible and powerful environment for arranging your music.

Build and Design

The SP-1200 is a reissue of classic hardware, with a rugged metal chassis that screams durability. It’s a piece of gear that looks and feels substantial. The Maschine Mikro Mk3, on the other hand, is a controller that requires a computer to function. It’s lightweight and portable, making it ideal for producers on the go.

Price and Value

At $1500, the SP-1200 is an investment, particularly for those who appreciate its iconic sound and build. The Maschine Mikro Mk3 is much more affordable at $269, making it accessible for beginners and hobbyists who want a taste of professional music production.

Pros and Cons

EMU SP-1200 (reissued in 2021)

Pros:

• Iconic, gritty 12-bit sound
• Classic hardware feel
• Rugged build quality
• Lo-fi effects for unique sound textures

Cons:

• High price point
• No screen or pads
• Limited polyphony and sample rate
• No software integration

Native Instruments Maschine Mikro Mk3

Pros:

• Affordable and accessible
• 16 velocity-sensitive pads
• Integrated software with a vast sound library
• High polyphony and sample rate

Cons:

• Requires a computer to operate
• Less tactile hardware experience
• Limited standalone functionality

Final Verdict

In conclusion, the EMU SP-1200 (reissued in 2021) and the Native Instruments Maschine Mikro Mk3 are two very different samplers, each with its own strengths. The SP-1200 is best suited for those who love vintage gear and the character of lo-fi sounds. It’s ideal for hip-hop producers and anyone seeking that classic touch in their music. On the other hand, the Maschine Mikro Mk3 is perfect for those who want a modern, versatile production tool. It’s great for beginners and seasoned producers alike who want to integrate software into their workflow seamlessly.

Ultimately, the right choice depends on your preferences and production needs. Whether you choose the timeless appeal of the SP-1200 or the modern capabilities of the Maschine Mikro Mk3, both samplers offer exciting possibilities for your music-making journey.