EMU SP-1200 (reissued in 2021) —  VS  — Polyend Tracker

Polyend Tracker vs. EMU SP-1200 (Reissued in 2021)

Summary: The Polyend Tracker and the EMU SP-1200 (reissued in 2021) are two samplers that offer unique features for music producers. While the Tracker provides a modern twist with high polyphony and a wide range of effects, the SP-1200 is a classic choice, known for its iconic lo-fi sound.

Introduction

In the world of music production, samplers play a crucial role in shaping the sounds and rhythms we hear in our favorite tracks. Today, we’re diving into a detailed comparison of two fascinating samplers—the Polyend Tracker and the EMU SP-1200 (reissued in 2021). Each offers something special for music makers, but how do they stack up against each other? Let’s explore their features, pros, and cons to help you decide which one suits your musical needs best.

Feature Comparisons

Polyphony and Sound Quality

The Polyend Tracker boasts an impressive 64-note polyphony, which means it can play up to 64 notes at once. This is perfect for complex compositions that require multiple layers of sound. Its sample rate is 44.1kHz, providing high-quality audio that matches the standard CD quality. On the other hand, the EMU SP-1200 offers a more limited 12-note polyphony. Its sample rate is 26.04kHz, giving it a distinctive lo-fi sound that many producers love for its vintage vibe. While the Tracker excels in audio clarity and complexity, the SP-1200 captures the hearts of those seeking that classic gritty sound.

Storage and Inputs/Outputs

When it comes to storage, the Polyend Tracker uses a MicroSD card, allowing you to expand your memory easily. This makes it convenient for producers who like to work with large libraries of samples. In contrast, the EMU SP-1200 relies on internal memory, which might limit the number of samples you can store at a time.

As for inputs and outputs, the Tracker is equipped with MIDI In/Out, USB, and Audio In/Out, giving you plenty of connectivity options for integrating with other gear. The SP-1200, however, offers only Audio In/Out, which might be a drawback for those who want more connectivity options.

Interface and Ease of Use

The Polyend Tracker features an LCD display, making it easier to navigate through its settings and features. Although it doesn’t have pads, it uses a button-based interface that suits its tracker-style workflow. In contrast, the EMU SP-1200 doesn’t include a screen, which can make it more challenging for beginners to use. However, some producers appreciate the tactile and straightforward nature of its classic button interface.

Effects and Sequencing

Both samplers come with built-in sequencers, allowing you to create patterns and sequences directly on the device. The Polyend Tracker shines with its multiple effects, offering a wide range of sound-shaping tools to enhance your tracks. Conversely, the EMU SP-1200 is known for its lo-fi effects, providing that coveted vintage texture to your samples. If you’re chasing that nostalgic sound, the SP-1200 might be the perfect fit.

Pros and Cons

Polyend Tracker

Pros:

• High polyphony (64 notes)
• High sample rate (44.1kHz) for clear audio
• Expandable storage with MicroSD
• Multiple connectivity options (MIDI, USB, Audio)
• LCD display for better navigation
• Multiple effects for versatile sound design

Cons:

• No pads for input
• Higher price point ($1200)
• No software integration

EMU SP-1200 (Reissued in 2021)

Pros:

• Iconic lo-fi sound with 26.04kHz sample rate
• Classic hardware appeal
• Simple interface for hands-on control
• Known for its unique character in sound

Cons:

• Limited polyphony (12 notes)
• Limited storage with internal memory
• Only Audio In/Out connectivity
• No screen for visual feedback
• Higher price point ($1500)

Final Verdict

In summary, the choice between the Polyend Tracker and the EMU SP-1200 (reissued in 2021) comes down to your musical needs and preferences. If you’re looking for a modern sampler with high polyphony, clear sound, and a wide array of effects, the Polyend Tracker is a fantastic choice. It’s especially great for producers who prefer a digital workflow with plenty of connectivity options.

On the other hand, if you’re drawn to the classic, gritty sounds of hip-hop’s golden era and prefer a more straightforward, tactile interface, the EMU SP-1200 is a dream come true. Its lo-fi charm and classic hardware design make it a beloved tool for those seeking that vintage sound.

Ultimately, both samplers have their unique strengths, making them valuable tools in any producer’s arsenal. Choose the one that aligns with your style and workflow, and you’ll be on your way to creating amazing music.